http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/14/labour-peers-suspended
Now, why is it that these peers may be barred because they offered to change laws for money, but many on the Conservative front bench do so as a legitimate job?
I don't necessary want this to be a party issue, i just would like to know what the difference is
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
Popular Posts
-
There is a part of my that thinks "fuck off back where you came from", but the condescending liberal in me welcomes her, her diffe...
-
General Sir Francis Richard Dannatt was doing an interview on TMS and discussed the war in Afghanistan. I thought he spoke with great intell...
-
Yeah yeah yeah, blah blah blah . The Lib Dems have moved significantly to the right under Clegg, their stupid and patronising attempts to ge...
-
It's certainly an issue, and something I'm glad politicians are look at, although the Tories (if the quote here is properly represen...
-
"The Tory press have turned on Clegg because Rupert Murdoch will feel out of the loop if the Liberal Democrats end up having the balanc...
-
I just cannot support what we are doing on this . It seems to me, and I may be wrong, that law-makers are totally divorced from the realitie...
-
Firstly , it's a shame that an attempt at provoking debate has been attacked like this. Secondly, if it does come down to the rights of ...
-
wow . " I wouldn't want to be Clegg. He finds himself wielding power with no mandate for it, which tends to slaughter his own sacre...
-
My post from British Politics and Policy at LSE Ed Miliband has apologised for Labour’s record on immigration, although he did not make a...
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment